What is NOT an example of a prevention strategy for limiting liability?

Inspecting in greater depth areas where clients have concerns is not considered a prevention strategy for limiting liability. While addressing specific client concerns may seem like an effective way to provide thorough service, it can inadvertently increase liability exposure. By diving deeper into certain areas, an inspector may inadvertently affirm or dismiss issues that could lead to potential claims or misunderstandings.

On the other hand, performing a competent inspection ensures that all standard practices are followed, which helps in establishing professionalism and reduces the chances of omitted issues that could lead to liability. Ensuring that clients’ expectations are realistic helps in aligning their anticipated outcomes with what can realistically be provided, thus minimizing potential disputes later on. Finally, describing limitations specific to the home in your report is critical as it sets clear boundaries on the scope of the inspection and helps manage client expectations, which is key in limiting liability.